“As he should he’s a Dad”

In the wacky world of child custody battles, the courts may often become a platform for the most unusual and awe-inspiring grievances that have ever been brought before it. This is your chance to see the Houdini Mom perform her disappearing act. She has perfected the technique of vanishing, which has left Mr. Sanchez and the children in utter disbelief. Where is she going exactly? Perhaps they were participating in covert operations or attending Hogwarts. As she continues to keep everyone guessing about her location, the mystery continues to intensify. Is it some kind of sorcery, or could it just be a case of wanderlust? What we found the strangest outcome was how this mother confesses to not wanting children

Mr. Sanchez provides additional insight into the mysterious circumstances surrounding Houdini Mom’s disappearance. He divulges the information that ever since they ended their relationship, she has been missing for more than a month, and she has not communicated with or provided any aid to their children, particularly their child who has autism. While he is having trouble meeting all of their requirements on his own, he expresses astonishment at her appearance in court, which highlights her evasive conduct.

It would appear that the mother has a special skill that allows her to obtain prescription medications from the medical facility in which she works, which is a plot twist worthy of a screenplay. Mr. Sanchez is under the impression that she works at night as a walking pharmacy, procuring analgesics and other pain relievers for her own use. He raises concerns about discovering painkillers and needles, hinting that her place of employment might be the source because she works at a medical facility. He does this because he is concerned about finding them.

.Judge Vonda B raises concerns about the Houdini Mom’s lack of involvement in the children’s lives and the quality time she spends with them while Houdini Mom tries to excuse her conduct by asserting that the work she does saves lives. Even though, as you are probably aware, it is all staged and a reenactment, the fact that the mother relies on fast food and tablet gadgets for the children further adds to the shock that is felt in the courtroom. Mr. Sanchez highlights his personal dedication by pointing out that he has given up sleep and begun working late shifts in order to be present for his children. The mother appears to think that child support is a one-way street, despite the fact that Mr. Sanchez handles all of the financial responsibilities of the family.

She even has the nerve to demand monetary compensation from him, which is an astonishing turn of events. Is she a math genius or does she desperately need to brush up on the fundamentals of the subject? The only question I have for you is this: “How did you not see the warning signs when you first started?”It’s time to party—turn on the lights and the music! The mother’s commitment to the dance floor is unparalleled by any other person. Forget about her being a responsible parent; the most important thing in her life is making a name for herself in the world. When there’s a party to go to, who needs to get enough sleep or spend quality time with the kids? It’s all laughs and games up until someone has to pay the bills and look after the children, at which point things get serious. Is it possible for her to tango her way out of taking responsibility for her parents?

The mother is strongly reminded by the judge that it is her job to provide financial assistance for the children, and the judge asks the mother to reevaluate her priorities. The judge disagrees with the mother’s assertion that it is primarily the father’s responsibility to look after the children and emphasizes the significance of both parents being actively involved in their children’s life. The courtroom highlights in a hilarious manner the absurdity of Houdini Mom’s demands for financial aid while at the same time ignoring her responsibilities as a parent.

ads

During this time, the judge will be determining the parents’ financial duties. The father discloses that he makes a yearly salary of $60,000 and also states that Medicaid pays for the medical expenses of his children. Given that the mother works as a nurse, the court tells her that she may be required to reimburse the money that she received from Medicaid and proposes that she consider switching to private health insurance instead. Although the mother questions the father’s responsibility, the judge reminds her in no uncertain terms of her responsibilities as a mother.

Lady Houdini makes an attempt to escape her responsibilities by claiming that she is sorry she had children and pointing the finger of guilt at the children’s father. The mother’s perspective shifted once she found out she was pregnant, which is what the father points out as a rebuttal to the mother’s argument that they had both initially agreed to have children. The judge underscores that regardless of her initial desires, she now has a legal responsibility to support her children. This is in spite of the fact that she did not want this burden in the beginning.

The income of the father is used as the starting point for the calculations that the Judge Vonda will perform next. Following the deduction of taxes and taking into account the Medicaid reimbursement, the amount of child support that must be paid each month for two children comes to a total of $1,025. In addition, the judge directs the mother to pay $450 back to Medicaid each month.

The father is asking for back pay for the time that the mother was absent and did not give any financial support before she departed. The judge grants his request, which will result in arrears of $1,475, which will be paid at a rate of $25 per month going forward. As a consequence, the total amount of child support that must be paid each month, including any arrears, has been established at $1,500.

Lady Houdini shows her displeasure with the amount, concentrating on the fact that she wishes she had more money for her own personal delight. The judge recommends that she look into getting extra work so that she can increase the amount of money she brings in. The court has reached the end of its business, and the parents are excused from further participation in the proceeding.

This case was unbelievable, despite the fact that it is a recreation I’m seething, however, all of this might have been avoided if he had complied with the lady’s wish to not have children but hey, that’s just my thought. This case was unbelievable, despite the fact that it is a reenactment I’m fuming.